What happens when all that exists for an individual is a series of trip wires? Yes harmony through discord exists but what's there is something one might have to search for and find with expert level analysis. This means that there might be a possibility to act with fluidity and elegance while maintaing emotional integrity in regards to depth of feeling.When expletives become stretchy and long what will result. Will time take on newness so that passing of time is agreeable to the system?
Saturday, June 16, 2012
Land Mines and Delicacy: walking talking electric fence
Monday, June 11, 2012
Individuals who cast personal aspersions (sounds like Aspergers)
Talk about a touchy subject! Let's begin with the *purposefully* benign instance of a walk down the street. OOPS. Stepped in gum. Now what?
1. Start to fume like a volcano. Allow all kinds of thoughts to enter the mind such as, @#$#^#&#&#* !@#%^&%$## &*^%$## ^&&^$$ !!!!!!!! (direct these expletives towards the imagined individual )
2. Keep walking but remain peeved and petulant. Petulance enters the equation since from an outside perspective all that's seen is irritability for an unknown reason- (unknown because no one can tell there's gum on ones shoe but the one with the gum on the shoe).
3. Make a decisive decision which will direct the next course of action. a. Take the time to scrape the gum off the shoe using a tool This is good since this type of behavior is what separates animals and people.
Now all one has to do is self-congratulate.
1. Start to fume like a volcano. Allow all kinds of thoughts to enter the mind such as, @#$#^#&#&#* !@#%^&%$## &*^%$## ^&&^$$ !!!!!!!! (direct these expletives towards the imagined individual )
2. Keep walking but remain peeved and petulant. Petulance enters the equation since from an outside perspective all that's seen is irritability for an unknown reason- (unknown because no one can tell there's gum on ones shoe but the one with the gum on the shoe).
3. Make a decisive decision which will direct the next course of action. a. Take the time to scrape the gum off the shoe using a tool This is good since this type of behavior is what separates animals and people.
Now all one has to do is self-congratulate.
Saturday, June 9, 2012
The Mind and it's intrinsic ability to create/manifest Artificial Reality, Simulation, and how This relates to Imagination and Creativity..
Yesterday, I had the pleasure of watching Men in Black 3 or MIBIII. It was a real treat for many reasons that include: Pitbulls "Back in Time" which I like as much if not more than Will Smith's tune "Here come the men in Black". This movie touches upon the concept of time travel and people's ability to move through dimensions . Human and alien interaction is explored and like usual brought to life through wonderful imaginative creations. Many of the alien creations were found in the kitchen in Chinatown. Interestingly enough many had the appearance of being an aquatic creature and this is not the first time the relation between the deep sea/coral reef/shallow water dwelling oceanic species has made it's way as to resemble alien life. It's true that space and the ocean have similarities. The Ocean is up for exploration just like the universe.
How does the mind relate to space, time travel and simulation? Well the explanation is two fold- before I went to see mib3 I had a though provocative experience.
In the passenger side of a vehicle traveling aprox. 45 mph with the early evening sun casting light on my face directly (since the window was down) and the wheels of the tires moving through puddles of water (the was after rain) for a split second/ instant I could picture myself on top of a mountain and flying through the air just like snowboarder the flying tomato Shaun White. Ding!
What was the difference between this instant of complete mental immersion into a pretend or made up version of flying through the air and the actual experience of doing such? The obvious response is well- one is real and one is fake.
How does the mind relate to space, time travel and simulation? Well the explanation is two fold- before I went to see mib3 I had a though provocative experience.
In the passenger side of a vehicle traveling aprox. 45 mph with the early evening sun casting light on my face directly (since the window was down) and the wheels of the tires moving through puddles of water (the was after rain) for a split second/ instant I could picture myself on top of a mountain and flying through the air just like snowboarder the flying tomato Shaun White. Ding!
What was the difference between this instant of complete mental immersion into a pretend or made up version of flying through the air and the actual experience of doing such? The obvious response is well- one is real and one is fake.
Thursday, June 7, 2012
Findings in nature part a zillion
On Friday, June First, 2012 I spotted a couple of cardinals playing on the garden hose by the wall. This incident was particularly interesting to me because I believe they were trying to get a drink from it in addition to playing for playing sake.
Today, I found this picture of a small bird next to a kelly (This isn't Kelly Green but Olive Green) Green garden hose. This image definitely doesn't portray the instance of what it was like to glimpse the two cardinals but has a completely different mood. With this in mind, it's intriguing to compare how birds by garden hoses are able to have separate and even conflicting manners of coming across to an individual like myself. Why does this issue present itself to have relevancy (The Scientific word one borrows from physics or Earth Sciences is proving adequate in explanation right now since it's being brought up to attention how vastly diverse the pairing of objects can be and photography is the simplest modern medium to capture this since it's advent although of course drawing and other photo realist-type of works do a good job. However, that type of talk isn't that significant. Especially when at it's essence this is an idea that's born out of feeling/emotion as it's only way to comprehend the issue.
Points being made broken down for simple comprehension:
1. Two Objects - Bird (object A) Garden Hose (object B)
2. Bird (Object A) and Bird 2 (Object A1) playing by the Garden Hose (Object B)
3. Bird (Object A) and Garden Hose (Object B) With the Bird (Object A) sitting next to the Garden Hose (Object B) not playing
4. What's the difference between the Number One (1.) example and the Number Two (2.) Example? OK asking to find a difference is a lot- maybe that's too much to figure out. Let's reduce it so that it's much easier. (It (It) being the gleaming) does it seem apparent that the only way to tell a difference with similar objects is when the application of feeling/emotion is put into play with 1. and 2. ? This is one approach the other approach is to take out the entire instance of objects and base it completely on theory, here we now have an idea that is just what if we only thought used the imagination to think we might have seen two birds and then another one only through digital formal through the google images search. Now there's no way any one will predict any sort of conclusion. No equals (=), No sum or end product that will be brought up.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)